This week, the government announced its plan to clear the path for almost 100,000 new homes. While we agree that building more homes is essential to tackling the housing crisis, we believe it must be done in a way that protects our precious green spaces.

We urgently need a change to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) so that Green Fields are NOT removed from the Green Belt. These areas of countryside are vital for wildlife, carbon capture, flood prevention, and our community’s wellbeing. Once lost, they are gone forever.

Instead, the government should stick to its existing proposal to prioritise the “Grey Belt” – previously developed land such as disused car parks, petrol stations, and derelict urban spaces. These are the right places to build, not the fields that make our towns and villages greener, healthier, and more resilient.

We absolutely need more homes – but we can do it without sacrificing the very landscapes that make our communities special.

This task force is a threat, they can steamroller over our countryside..

👉 Read more about the New Homes Accelerator task force here.

Let’s build the homes we need, in the right place, at the right time – not at the cost of our Green Belt.

#saveourgreenbelt #greenbelt #burntwood #newhomes #wrongtimewrongplace


Discover more from Burntwood Action Group

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 responses to “Protecting Our Green Belt While Building the Homes We Need”

  1. dazzling321f0bc0fc

    I absolutely agree

    Keeping green spaces surrounding our villages helps not only the climate and the animal life .but also the mental health of our communities. Why spoil what is already beautiful.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. The problem is Margaret this government has pledged to build 1.5 million homes in this parliament and building on existing derelict sites is harder than running a steamroller through a nice easy green field on the edge of an existing settlement. It will change our countries landscape forever. And it’s very, very sad!

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Ken Leadbeater

    Please insert “not” so that it reads: “so that green fields are not removed from the Green Belt.”

    Thanks

    Ken

    Like

    1. Thanks for the proof read change Ken, thats been updated 👍

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Burntwood Action Group Cancel reply